考研英语学习对于大多数人来讲是一件非常头疼的事，特别是考研阅读，生词多，句式复杂，语法生涩让很多同学叫苦不停。其实考研英语中90%的文章基本来源于Times、纽约时报、科学杂志、自然杂志等时文外刊杂志。今天新航道考研小编给大家带来了历年考研英语外刊常考热点：是时候拆分Facebook了，希望对大家有帮助哦。
原文标题：It’s Time to Break Up Facebook
考研英语阅读话题-垄断
【行文脉络】提出观点（第一段）--批驳反方观点（第二至五段）--分析有利影响（第六至七段）
Part 1原文
Ⅰ For too long, lawmakers have marveled at Facebook’s explosive growth and overlooked their responsibility to ensure that Americans are protected and markets are competitive. Any day now, the Federal Trade Commission1 is expected to impose a $5 billion fine2 on the company, but that is not enough. We are a nation with a tradition of reining in monopolies, no matter how well intentioned the leaders of these companies may be. It is time to break up Facebook.
Ⅱ Since the 1970s, courts have become increasingly hesitant to break up companies or block mergers unless consumers are paying inflated prices that would be lower in a competitive market. But a narrow reliance on whether or not consumers have experienced price gouging fails to take into account the full cost of market domination. It doesn’t recognize that we also want markets to be competitive to encourage innovation and to hold power in check.
Ⅲ Facebook is the perfect case on which to reverse course, precisely because Facebook makes its money from targeted advertising, meaning users do not pay to use the service. But it is not actually free. Facebook’s business model is built on capturing as much of our attention as possible to encourage people to create and share more information about who they are and who they want to be. We pay for Facebook with our data and our attention, and by either measure it doesn’t come cheap.
Ⅳ Some economists are skeptical that breaking up Facebook would spur that much competition, because Facebook, they say, is a “natural” monopoly. Natural monopolies have emerged in areas like water systems and the electrical grid, where the price of entering the business is very high - because you have to lay pipes or electrical lines - but it gets cheaper and cheaper to add each additional customer. In other words, the monopoly arises naturally from the circumstances of the business, rather than a company’s illegal maneuvering. In addition, defenders of natural monopolies often make the case that they benefit consumers because they are able to provide services more cheaply than anyone else.
Ⅴ Facebook is indeed more valuable when there are more people on it: There are more connections for a user to make and more content to be shared. But the cost of entering the social network business is not that high. And unlike with pipes and electricity, there is no good argument that the country benefits from having only one dominant social networking company.
Ⅵ The cost of breaking up Facebook would be next to zero for the government, and lots of people stand to gain economically. A ban on short-term acquisitions would ensure that competitors, and the investors who take a bet on them, would have the space to flourish. Digital advertisers1 would suddenly have multiple companies vying for their dollars.
Ⅶ But the biggest winners would be the American people. Imagine a competitive market in which they could choose among one network that offered higher privacy standards, another that cost a fee to join but had little advertising and another that would allow users to customize and tweak their feeds as they saw fit. No one knows exactly what Facebook’s competitors would offer to differentiate themselves. That’s exactly the point.
Part 2长难句语法点拨
Imagine a competitive market in which they could choose among one network that offered higher privacy standards, another that cost a fee to join but had little advertising and another that would allow users to customize and tweak their feeds as they saw fit.
本句主干是Imagine a competitive market，后面一长串都是 market的定语，which引导一个定语从句，该从句的主干是they could choose among one network…… another……and another，他们可以从这三种network中进行选择，每一种都跟了一个定语从句修饰，最后一个定语从句中as引导方式状语从句，表示允许用户根据他们认为合适的方式去customize and tweak 定制和调整.
Part 3
写作句型借鉴
For too long, people have marveled at XX and overlooked YY.
很久以来，人们对XX惊叹不已，却忽视了YY。
原文例句：For too long, lawmakers have marveled at Facebook’s explosive growth and overlooked their responsibility to ensure that Americans are protected and markets are competitive. 很久以来，立法者们对Facebook的迅猛增长惊叹不已，却忽视了他们在保护美国人民、维系市场自由竞争方面的责任。
But a narrow reliance on XX fails to take into account YY.(YY很长放到account后，比较短放到take后)
但是，仅依赖于XX作为判断依据，有失考虑YY。
原文例句：But a narrow reliance on whether or not consumers have experienced price gouging fails to take into account the full cost of market domination.
但是，仅依赖于消费者是否遭到哄抬物价作为判断依据，有失考虑市场主导地位（即垄断）带来的所有代价。
Defenders of XX often make the case that ……
XX的捍卫者经常声称……
原文例句：In addition, defenders of natural monopolies often make the case that they benefit consumers because they are able to provide services more cheaply than anyone else.此外，自然垄断的捍卫者经常声称，自然垄断有利于消费者，因为此类企业能够提供最低廉的服务。
以上就是小编给大家介绍的历年考研英语外刊常考热点：是时候拆分Facebook了，希望对大家有帮助。
