你身边有抽烟的人吗?你对他们是一种什么态度呢?有多少人是试图想要阻止他们吸烟或者是吸烟者本人自己下定决心戒烟，但都以失败而告终。但是，戒烟真的有那么难吗?是什么导致我们不能成功的戒烟?
我们都知道吸烟有害身体健康，但是现在每年都有很多的人在吸烟，每年仍旧有很多人因吸烟而导致疾病甚至是死亡。每年烟产量的销售也并没有因些而减少，究竟这个问题该如何解决，有什么更好的办法才能让吸烟者更好的、成功的戒烟呢?
Nicotine replacement therapy is no more effective at helping people stop smoking than going cold turkey, a new study indicates.
Gums, patches and nasal sprays that supply smokers with nicotine do not help people quit cigarettes over the long term any better than going it alone, a United States study said on Monday.
The research by the Harvard University School of Public Health followed 787 adults in the state of Massachusetts who had recently quit smoking and found that over time just as many relapsed after nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as without - about a third.
"This study shows that using NRT is no more effective in helping people stop smoking cigarettes in the long term than trying to quit on one's own," says lead author Hillel Alpert, a researcher at Harvard.
Study participants were surveyed over three time periods: 2001-2002, 2003-2004 and 2005-2006.
Not only were relapse rates about the same among those who used NRT and those who did not, the study found that heavily dependent smokers who took NRT without professional therapy were twice as likely to relapse as those who did not use NRT.
"This may indicate that some heavily dependent smokers perceive NRT as a sort of 'magic' pill, and upon realizing it is not, they find themselves without support in their quitting efforts, doomed to failure," says the study in the journal Tobacco Control.
Although previous randomized controlled studies have shown NRT to be effective in helping smokers quit, the latest research shows the weakness of those trials among the general population in a real-life setting, the authors argue.
The study also shows very few people follow the recommendations of using NRT for eight weeks, with many opting for shorter periods of use.
The NRT industry has boomed since nicotine gum was first introduced in 1984, according to background information in the article. Back then, NRT products were a $45 million industry in the US.
Since over-the-counter sales of NRT were approved in 1996, the industry has soared to $800 million per year. On top of that, sales of prescription drugs to stop smoking reached $841 million dollars in 2007.
More public funds are also helping to subsidize stop-smoking therapies to low-income Americans, with 39 state Medicaid programs covering one or more kinds of NRT in 2011, compared to 17 states in 1996.
Meanwhile, rates of smoking in the US have leveled off at about 20 percent of the population in the past five years after a steady period of decline.
"What this study shows is the need for the Food andDrug Administration ... to approve only medications that have been proven to be effective in helping smokers quit in the long term and to lower nicotine in order to reduce the addictiveness of cigarettes," says co-author Gregory Connolly, director of Harvard's Center for Global Tobacco Control.
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, whose US products include the NicoDerm CQ patch and Nicorette gum, responds to the study by saying "there remains strong support for NRT's efficacy and its positive impact on public health".
In a statement, it cites the World Health Organization, leading experts and world governments that "agree that NRT products have a crucial role to play in helping to reduce the devastating toll of disease caused by tobacco dependence".
It also references "numerous studies (that) show smokers who use NRT products per the dosing recommendations, combined with support, can double their chances of successfully quitting over 'cold turkey.'"
